REVELATION: INTERPRETATIONS
The
book of Revelation presents a complex narrative. For this reason it receives a
diversity of interpretations. Its text contains elements from the epistolary,
apocalyptic and prophetic literature. Some see it from a merely idealistic
perspective, that is, it does not deal with historical events. His symbolic
pictures contain only spiritual truths concerning the conflict between the
Kingdom of God and the spiritual forces of evil [1]. It is clear that this is a
precarious interpretation, for it is easy to observe, in this Johannine text,
the existence of concrete past and future events in his narrative.
Others,
within a preterist view, maintain that it was written to encourage the church
of the first century that was under heavy persecution. Scholars of the Greek
text, in Europe, accept this interpretation. It is a fact, and the text itself
confirms, that this book was written for the "...seven churches in the
province of Asia" (1.4), which were real churches visited by John. For
this reason, it is acceptable to suppose that the early church saw itself in
the plot of Revelation and was strengthened with the message of God's victory
over evil. But because it is a prophecy (according to 1:2 and 22:7), at the
same time that this text speaks to those of his time, it also sheds light on
the future.
The
main form of interpretation of the church's reformers in the 16th century is
situated within a historical vision. Influenced by Augustine of Hippo, Calvin
and Luther understood that there is no millenarian kingdom, future, distinct
from the Church. The present era, in which the Church acts in the propagation
of the Gospel, is that millenarianist kingdom. And in the future will come the
great tribulation, after which will come the final judgment and the "new
heavens and new earth". The reformers understand that this millennial
kingdom has already been inaugurated with Christ. He "already" is a
present reality, according to Matthew 11:5-6; 12:28; 13:1-46, but it is also a
kingdom that "has not yet" been fully realized according to Matthew
6:10; 16:28 (HORTON, 2016, P.979).
There
is also a fourth interpretation: the futurist. In this, most events refer to
the end of time (chapter 4 to 22). It is the so-called dispensational
pre-milenarism.This interpretation defends a secret rapture of the Church,
before the Great Tribulation, in which God will return to deal with the Israeli
nation. After this period of intense suffering for humanity, Christ will
return with the Church and implant his kingdom of 1,000 years on Earth. At the
end of this period, Satan is released and deceives, again, the nations.There is
a final war and only then comes the "new heavens and new earth"
(HORTON, 2016, P.979).
There
are, in fact, certain hermeneutic difficulties in interpreting the Apocalypse.
Seeking a literal meaning in its text implies a misinterpretation, since
apocalyptic literature is highly symbolic. The reader needs to see the world
that emerges from the text and not his own. The Apostle John seems to want to
show, that the kingdom of God, who has already come into the world with Christ
and fights for its full implantation through the preaching of the gospel, will
be harshly persecuted by Satan, when he is released, at the end of this era.
But God, at that time, will cast his judgments on the earth and destroy the
present world order, established in original sin, beginning "new heavens
and a new earth" (Revelation 21.1), thus restoring all Creation.
Antônio
Maia - M. Div.
Copyright
[1]
Bíblia Nova Versão Internacional (comentada). São Paulo: Ed Vida, 2003, p.2167.
HORTON,
Michael. Doutrinas da Fé Cristã. São Paulo: Ed Cultura Cristã, 2016.
Comments
Post a Comment